spacetropic

saturnine, center-right, sometimes neighborly

December 27, 2006

The Strange, Angry Fear of Cincinnati

Perception, even distorted bias, is everything. A recent editorial from the Cincinnati Enquirer tackles the perception of downtown on the part of people from the region who live in the outer exurbs. Associate editor Byron McCauley relates the tale:
One of the students in a class I teach at the University of Cincinnati recently startled me when he said his mom, who lives in one of Cincinnati's outer-ring suburbs, won't step foot into Cincinnati for fear of being mugged, shot or killed.
This is a familiar scenario. The fact that we bought a house in a city neighborhood last year was met by stunned expressions when I told coworkers, some of whom seemed at first confused, then offended. "We think the city is really going downhill," said one guy.

The plural must have included his wife, who wasn't even part of the conversation. When pressed for detail he cited crime and lackluster city government. The second item I let pass - political ineptitude is hard to dispute - but when pressed for evidence on the second item he talked about gang and drug related violence in the core city neighborhoods. Then he admitted he'd never really lived in the city besides an apartment after college. Finally this same person made some thinly-veiled reference to “certain cultural groups” at which point I lost interest in hearing his perspective.

McCauly continues:
I live half my life downtown; the other half in the burbs. Both have their inherent advantages, but this column is about why we all have a stake in the future of a strong downtown.

I spent a lot of time this year listening to folks cast doubt on living, working and playing in the central city. I also spent a lot of time hearing the opposite while walking and running about downtown, from Over-the-Rhine to its western, southern and eastern edges. I spoke with common folk and opinion leaders.

Almost to a person, they say perception is skewing reality. Those who live, work and play downtown want you to come and see before passing judgment. It's wise counsel. If I didn't have a downtown job, I'd be down here often for the urban vibe.
Perception ebbs into the most radical form of judgement so quickly: Here’s one blogger’s account of a discussion she (a Muslim woman) had with a neighbor about the city. If it sounds implausible – trust me it isn’t. And what baffles me about this mindset is that it isn’t content to merely move to Westchester, or Mason, or wherever. Many who make this decision want to convince you that you are nuts for making another choice – for taking a different position on the value of city life, and the risk/reward tradeoffs that come with an environment that isn’t a sub-development. And some are actually angry if you don’t see things the same way.

For some, variety is not the spice of life. Conformity is solace. I'ts hard for me to understand (possibly because I'm a conservative too, but one who hails from the East Coast) but think it has to do with a remembrance of a 1950s-like past that maybe seemed to exist longer in Cincinnati than elsewhere.

This is a city, of course, to which (Mark Twain famously observed) one could go when the world ended – because it’s always 20 years behind. Perhaps hardcore social conservatives can’t reconcile themselves to a Cincinnati that has changed. And might this be connected with the recent changeover of the city and county government to the Democrats? Have many old-guard Republicans evacuated to the ‘burbs, where, at the expense of a sterile, corporate anonymity, the perception of an environment like the 50s lingers?

Hat tips Brian and the Dean.

7 Comments:

At 9:01 AM, Blogger Rockin' Hejabi said...

Thank you for this insight into the insanity that is around this city! Oh and thanks also for linking to my blog! Wow I never knew I would get this many cross-references for my article!

It's so true, so many people go around making comments about how "it's a real war zone now" in the city of Cincinnati, you'd be a fool to live there, you're risking your life to go into the city for any reason especially downtown or around UC etc... but these same folks don't live in Cincy. I can't help but think it's just more fear of the unknown. I've noticed that people especially in the outlying areas here are very very afraid of anything they are not familiar with. In one part of Indiana where the majority of my relatives still live, it's a big deal if a bi-racial child comes into the school district; everyone talks about the child and his/her mother / parents, they are many times ostracized, etc. Mark Twain is so right!

 
At 11:04 AM, Blogger Rachel said...

Brendan,

I am amused and yet disheartened by the reactions of my 14 and 15 year old students in the 'burbs when they find out I live 5-10 minutes from downtown Cincinnati. Reactions range from shock, surprise, and even outright pity. The first time I talked about Pleasant Ridge, it took me a good 5 minutes to explain that it was an actual community in and of itself, not a subdivision in Mason or Lebanon. When the kids realized how close I was to downtown, they were very concerned about my safety.

 
At 8:05 PM, Blogger BizzyBlog said...

If Rudy Giuliani can turn around the perceptions about a city of 8 million, you would think that someone in Cincinnati would realize that the perceptions around here, which are unfortunately supported by enough reality to be credible (e.g., 2006 had the highest murder RATE in the city's history) can be turned around if SOMEONE just exercises the will to do it.

But no one will. And so the perception will be fed, and become ever more difficult to turn around. We're maybe 3 years away from Cincinnati being seen as Little Detroit and, like the rest of SE Michigan with Motown, the rest of the Greater Cincy area will try to pretend the Queen City doesn't exist.

Unless SOMEONE in charge in the city sees what's at stake and goes to the zero-tolerance policing that saved NYC.

Some people in the burbs will never change their minds, but many will. I left the city in the mid-1980s because I saw what was coming, saw declining will to deal with it, and realized that it was "you only have one chance" time in terms of kids. Unfortunately, my fears about deterioration, esp in Northside, where I was, have mostly been borne out.

I'm irritated from time to time with people who want to make it the fault of people in the burbs that the city is declining, when every year it extracts tens of millions of dollars from non-residents who happen to work in the city (i.e., taxation without representation) -- and it STILL can't get its fiscal act together.

All of that said, I'm certainly not going to question anyone else who looks at the pros and cons and decides that the city is the place to be.

 
At 9:17 PM, Blogger Superfly said...

Tom, I hope I didn't give the impression that it was my intention to question anyone who "looks at the pros and cons and decides that the city is the place to be". But the pros and cons are different for different people, and I think most of the people who see the value proposition your way have already left. There will always be more (some of it will vary depending on your phase of life), but there are others going in the other direction, and others still who move to the area – and none of it gets any press.

Right across the street from my house in Pleasant Ridge a family just moved here from Mason, and I know of several others. But I have also actively discouraged people from living in my neighborhood in the past – especially if they’re the type of folks who think a African –American kid in baggy clothes walking down the street means a bad neighborhood. They wouldn’t be happy here, we don’t want them here, and there are plenty of other choices.

Most of the people who keep bitching about the city long after they’ve already moved never mention the tax issue – at least the ones I’ve heard. And trust me, I’ve heard the litany over and over again.

Crime is a problem, and the murder rate is a disaster. But what does this mean, in practical terms? Are you or your family in danger if you go to dinner after a Bengals game? Certainly there are some lousy neighborhoods, but what is amazing to me (and many others who live in the city) are the laughable amounts of distortion that goes on with real danger. They have no capacity to actually gauge risk, and every neighborhood is equal to Price Hill. It’s all one city when they hear about it on the news – and from that point forward every fact confirms that assumption. Somebody broke into a car a few blocks away last week? Let’s hear the chorus: The city is in decline. This is what’s weird - almost quaint – to somebody who has actually lived in a big city.

The notion of “decline” seems subjective. It’s changing, sure – but the population figures were not nearly as bad as everyone assumed (not before getting added to the aforementioned litany). I’d like to see more growth, but it does come down to perception. How you talk about the deal is absolutely critical, and the quick shorthand phrase becomes the mental furniture for how we think about the inherent value.

I’ve been concerned about this issue for a while, but lately I’m quite optimistic. I just do not think Cincinnati will ever resemble what it was in the past – and to hold it to the false expectations of people who don’t even live here anymore is foolish.

 
At 11:15 PM, Blogger BizzyBlog said...

Brendan, no, you didn't give that impression.

As to crime, no the average person coming in for a sports event, or a night at the Aronoff, or to shop, isn't in much danger.

But I can also tell you that, given who all the people just hanging out for no apparent reason, even standing on the sidewalk on 6th between Vine and Walnut 20 years ago after dark made me nervous, and I'm a mostly "what me, worry?" type. Based on some of what happened in that area on evenings shortly thereafter, there was plenty of reason to be nervous. Maybe it's better there now; I somehow doubt it.

I'll agree that it's not as bad as Chs 5-9-12-19 make it out to be (local news is such a distorting wasteland). But it's way worse than it should be when you have a virtual gang war going on in broad daylight at Mitchell and Vine (as occurred earlier this hear), or when you have what I recall as a wrong-place, wrong-time murder about one mile from you not long ago (Kennedy and Montgomery).

Again, someone has to grab the crime problem with both hands and flog it like Rudy did. In the process, a vocal repudiation of the failures in enforcement in the 5-1/2 years since the riots would be very useful.

 
At 1:20 PM, Blogger Superfly said...

Just a footnote on that Kennedy/Montgomery crime - it was a calculated robbery, planned in advance. One of the kids attempting the hold-up shot the other kid, and he was arrested the next day. All of the churches in the area had a candlelight vigil afterwards.

But of course the first draft of that news story (which was initially reported as random) is what you remembered - because it fits the mold.

Not in the press are the people involved in neighborhood watch, the Girl Scouts doing charitable work at KH Presbyterian, the fresh paint on the community center, the new mulch on the playground, the lights that have been installed on Montgomery road. It's not all good news, but the bad news validates the perception, so it propagates.

 
At 1:48 PM, Blogger BizzyBlog said...

This is sad, but the things you point out remind me of the "no good news out of Iraq" complaints.

And the initial misreporting of the KH incident reminds me of the initial misreports and exaggerations on so many violent incidents in Iraq.

That is really weak that the KH truth is not more widely known.

There is no denying that the local news, esp TV and top of hour radio, do a disservice to the city.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home